![]() Roundcube looks better but many things do not work optimal or not at all. Click to expand.This setting can only be made based on a domain name, not based on a specific user. Squirrelmail works but is outdated in how it looks. ROUNDCUBE VS SQUIRRELMAIL INSTALLīut there are two workarounds if you wish to provide your users with a choice:ġ) You can create subdomains to your domain and install your own webmail clients, e.g. your own version of Horde or your own of Roundcube or others like Squirrel Mail etc. What’s the difference between Postfix, Roundcube, and SquirrelMail Compare Postfix vs. Then you users can always choose which one to use.Ģ) You can create subdomains and set their "webmail" sub(-sub)-domain to Horde and Roundcube per subdomain. SquirrelMail in 2022 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years in business, region, and more using the chart below. This will however let you end up with the third level like "" and ".com".Īt this time however I strongly discourage the use of Horde, because a security issue has been found that enables an attacker to gain full access to a server simply by sending a prepared image file to a user who uses Horde and opens that mail. Sneaky users could even send such a special image file to themselves and gain shell access using the security flaw. Save time and reduce your workload for creating, marking and analysing exams. The Horde community has not yet provided a patch. Synap is an award-winning exam platform that empowers organisations to deliver secure, online exams with ease. 2 RoundCube Roundcube offers more user-friendly and fairly intuitive interface for your emails as compared to Squirrelmail. For some operating systems there are "homemade" patches available, but none is official.I would really love this. With DANE support coming to S/MIME (see ) it would let me publish a DANE record 2 1 1 intermediate certificate that could be used to sign S/MIME certs for each user account that wants it without the cost of certificate authorities. The mail service I provide is webmail only, I would want the S/MIME keys/certs on the webmail server which some people rightfully object to but those people should be using mail services that are not webmail only. Whoever is working on this should take that draft RFC into consideration so that roundcube can DANE validate S/MIME certs sent by other users. ![]() I believe current version of OpenSSL support DNSSEC validation, not sure if the php wrapper does. This is how I'd go about implementing it: S/MIME: Certificate info in Contacts details page (optional) S/MIME: Handling of certs attached to incoming messages S/MIME: Sending signed/encrypted messages But on a webmail server that wants to offer DANE validation of S/MIME certs, it is reasonable IMHO to require they use a DNSSEC validating recursive resolver so the webmail server itself only needs to validate that the zone is DNSSEC signed (easy to do) and doesn't need to do the DNSSEC validation itself. This allows me to build the code up without worrying about ancillary functionality and "bookkeeping" type stuff until I get to step 2, and I won't need to have private keys around until step 4. I think that progression should also make it easy for someone to pick up the work if I have to abandon it. So maybe you'd like to put some bounties on these steps for anyone to pick up, or we could contract directly. I love the simplicity of the interface, yet it offers enough features so that it is comparable to using a decent desktop client.I am an independent IT consultant and one of my main clients is a university in Germany, where S/MIME support in Roundcube would be a very nice to have feature since all users have S/MIME certificates, however it's not a priority requirement and there are no plans for it right now. I have to say that I wish I'd tested it earlier. Roundcube The Interfaceįirst, I'd like to point out some of the pros and cons of Roundcube. However, on a whim, I took Roundcube webmail for a test drive and was so impressed that I just had to take some time to compare and contrast the two webmail clients head-to-head. ![]() When I decided to go to webmail for my own website's email management, I used Horde because it's what I was used to. Horde is one of the first webmail clients that I used, but I always found it to be a bit clunky and confusion. There are a few top contenders in the world of webmail clients, that can handle any email account just like your desktop clients do. While desktop clients like Thunderbird or Spicebird are great full-featured email clients for when you're home on your computer, it's nice to have a webmail client that is nearly as powerful for organizing and responding to your email when you're away. What I wasn't quite ready for was choosing an email client that I wanted to use to access those emails.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |